Fake beauties: how neural networks help to deceive gullible men (12 photos)
There are more and more perfect pages in social networks, but non-existent girls in reality. These accounts were created with neural networks and have only one goal: to make money on men who are ready pay for flirting and nude pictures. Some of the creators of such fakes aims higher and tries to create digital photo models that can be sell to advertise goods.
Dozens of promoted accounts with photos of scantily clad charms have already flooded all the famous social networks, and this flywheel is gaining turns.
Digital beauties always have a very thoughtful background, talk about work, hobbies, willingly communicate with subscribers. These rising stars, who have a total of hundreds thousands of subscribers, receive from the latter both sincere admiration, and money.
This is Andrea and she looks like a real girl smiling in camera. Andrea has a Patreon page where she collects fees for "Nude" from the neural network
Andrea has over 30,000 followers on Twitter/X. Right in the description of the account contains the details of the PayPal account and offers Nude photos for Patreon followers. It's written on Patreon several payment options for various services - for example, for $ 300 a month, Andrea, in fact, "becomes your online girl.
This is Zoe Platinum. She claims to be 21, originally from Los Angeles and recently moved to Brooklyn.
This is Milla Sophia presenting herself as a beginner fashion model. She has a whole portfolio of portraits in which she is represented either in the office, or on vacation in Greece, or on the island of Bora Bora
This is Dina Ritter. Unlike the previous ones, she does not hide the fact that it doesn't exist in the real world. But don't ask your fans for money shy
Dina Ritter claims to be from Seattle. She has over 92 000 followers on Twitter/X. Its creator collects money from them from using CashApp, Tip Jar and donation pages. At the same time, it is no secret to anyone that Dina Ritter is an AI creation as there are images of her fingers not at all like the fingers of a real person.
This is Celestia. She claims that she is 19 years old and is engaged in visionary rethinking of creativity in the digital realm
Some AI-generated characters, such as Michela Souza, turned out to be marketing gimmicks that turned into gold mines
Michela Souza has starred in advertising campaigns for major brands such as Prada and Balenciaga, has been interviewed by Vogue and has been named one of the 25 Most Influential People on the Internet by Time magazine. This eternally 19-year-old girl with freckles is Trevor's brainchild McPhedris and Sarah DeKow, founders of fashion brand BRUD, which was launched back in 2019. At first, the creators of Michela liked to tease her fans and benefit from it. But in the end they were told the truth. “I’m not human,” Michela admitted on her page. AND added that her "hands" were trembling as she "wrote" the post.
In any case, Michela is not as convincing as all these the chic ladies who have been flooding social media lately. They interact with followers as if they were real people, and many are really confused. It is noted that the majority beauties generated by neural networks have big breasts and they are blondes. Brunettes and brown-haired women are much less.
This is Natalia Novak, who has 14,000 followers on Twitter/X. She says she's 21 and from LA
Natalya Novak successfully monetizes her exclusive content using a Patreon account and a donation collection function (Tip Jar) in Twitter/X.
This is Alexis Ividge. It is openly said about her that this virtual model and "bikini and lingerie lover" from Denver, state of Colorado.
Alexis Ividge to look more ubeditively, "friendly" with another AI beauty, Aimee Seltz, and posts photos with glamorous parties.
Alexis Ividge (gorgeous blonde), Aimee Seltz (gorgeous brunette) and Aimee Seltz with their 90-year-old grandmother
Aimee Seltz is a digital girl from Adelaide, South Australia. She has over 12,000 subscribers.
And this is Sarah Jordan, and she's "made in Australia" too. Sarah has over 266,000 followers.
Lizzie Monaghan doesn't have a bio on her online accounts, but she does quite a lot of fans. She recently published her portrait with long flowing red hair, fluttering in the wind, and garnered a lot of rave reviews
Midjourney, Stable Diffusion and DALL-E 2 are just systems image generation trained on thousands of existing images, which allows them to reproduce different styles, textures and elements. However, they all seem to be wrong in one thing - in the depiction of human hands
Except for this, everything looks extremely plausible. This is facilitated by the fact that many AI accounts are marked with checkmarks. verification. And social media users really want to believe that they got into a fairy tale.